From: (Ted Nolan <@ednolan>
Subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarok -- Fun movie
Full headers:
From: (Ted Nolan <tednolan>)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Thor: Ragnarok -- Fun movie
Date: 5 Nov 2017 03:03:17 GMT
Organization: loft
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <otluak$62i$>
X-Trace: 76Z3OCD5eOYgxOJ+7MolLwy+8ZYytavIisvk0jopSaRENItYoY
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NvYX5LhzA1yVGEF0BuNoPMEKuzo=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <otluak$62i$>,
Arthur Lipscomb<> wrote:
>On 11/3/2017 10:50 PM, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
>> Once again a flawless execution of the Marvel style: frequent bits of
>> real humor embedded in a story about characters facing superhero level
>> problems.
>> I'd say it was easy since they've done it so many times, but apparently not
>> as others seem unable.
>> I'd say the only weak performance in the bunch was Cate Blanchett, but
>> as she was mostly the Mcguffin that didn't really hurt the film.
>> I did wonder: Where were the Warriors Three & Lady Sif during
>> crucial events.  
>Uryn xvyyf Ibyfgntt naq Snaqeny jura fur svefg neevirf ba Nfthneq.  Fur 
>yngre xvyyf Ubtha jura ur fubjf hc yrnqvat gur zvyvgnel erfvfgnapr. 

Ah, ok.  I totally missed the first two and wasn't sure if the third guy
was one or not.  Man, I always had a soft spot for old Ibyfgntt..
What's not in Columbia anymore..