Subject: Disney vs. LA Times
To sum it up:
The Los Angeles Times wrote a story about Anaheim not benefiting from
the tax credits given to Disney's Park system.
Disney has retaliated by denying Los Angeles Times reporters access to
advance screenings of Disney films like THOR RAGNAROK.
In counter-retaliation, the National Society of Film Critics, the Los
Angeles Film Critics Association, The New York Film Critics Circle, and
the Boston Society of Film Critics have banned all Disney films from
their award eligibility.
The writer of this article claims that banning a Los Angeles film critic
from advanced screenings of the film is a violation of the First
Amendment. You'd think that journalists would have at least some
understanding of what the First Amendment is about...and as a hint, it
isn't about a journalist's 'right' to see movies before the rest of the
public can see them.