From: moviePig <>
Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id r138mr2254923itr.11.1510157296538;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <otsfd6$77k$>
From: moviePig <>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:08:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <5a032bef$0$33612$b1db1813$>
Organization: Unlimited download news at
X-Trace: DXC=913e<UAF4E;hZ4>`7BGPo4L?0kYOcDh@:VjW]G5LN^R;bE6Eg`kT^W0DECe\=Jg[8:>To2Z?E?3j:_9Nie2[21m6=;nad<A`lV1
X-Received-Bytes: 1879
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1147897303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/8/2017 10:42 AM, william ahearn wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 10:24:39 AM UTC-5, moviePig wrote:
>> Well, it does sound like a violation of the *spirit* of the First
>> Amendment.  Generally, press-events ought not hand-pick the press.
> Not even close. The press has no "right" to attend an activity sponsored by a corporation.

Not if it's a wedding or a vacation holiday.  But the impending release 
of big movies are by definition a matter of public interest, and timely 
reporting on them is the livelihood of a press segment.  While it seems 
(somewhat) reasonable that studios may occasionally cherry-pick certain 
reviewers for an *extra*-advanced screening, the usual press-only 
Monday(?) screenings seem more subject to the aforementioned "spirit".


- - - - - - - -
   YOUR taste at work...