Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:52:50 -0600
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.8 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BrWvmdzlqazTbPD0U/xFIn9iDHI=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Message-ID: <250102089.531859657.804651.address_is-invalid.invalid@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: BTR1701 <address_is@invalid.invalid>
References: <otsfd6$77k$1@dont-email.me>
<5a03224b$0$18141$b1db1813$e2fc663e@news.astraweb.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:52:50 -0600
Lines: 17
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-LksHPsym2qb9D6sP83FMv047Ow0Brsz4ims82SPWS2mCBcrF2gpQ2v+JSgf5EQ6RY6uNHr1CJ4maPMZ!4yF06LY7uAlldRjqk6pU85/Og+mckWNlBKmVW4pcuZl2Kp5iB3hn0P3t0ltpx6FHpo83uL5wz2jC!c0+9lWGjtTPe9tlczAbWpf5hCJGyuQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1998
X-Received-Bytes: 2120
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4285287063
Print Article
Forward Article
moviePig<pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:

> On 11/7/2017 9:19 AM, Obveeus wrote:
>> 
>> The writer of this article claims that banning a Los Angeles film critic 
>> from advanced screenings of the film is a violation of the First 
>> Amendment.