Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Full headers:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:52:51 -0600
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.8 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TvVvzOIMKJkGAx/Q1Lqk4VYJyd4=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: BTR1701 <address_is@invalid.invalid>
References: <otsfd6$77k$>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:52:51 -0600
Lines: 16
X-Trace: sv3-L3JK+EUjSIhaXPt4gO+46rIUBHldyTJP4mWka0eBbV1uqcYumR2gCP9LGVpFwwufN9zPNdp6mmeFkBS!KlJmunl+50IPbyNYWSqSXMFmXYkQrB73v8XrY12CQNSyvgzNPuUFE12koOWzAV1OhJ6TfOzEspka!29+6kc0aUU9gzRTv39lWAHk2rD23cg==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2006
Print Article
Forward Article
moviePig<> wrote:

> On 11/8/2017 10:42 AM, william ahearn wrote:

>> On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 10:24:39 AM UTC-5, moviePig wrote:
>>> Well, it does sound like a violation of the *spirit* of the First
>>> Amendment.  Generally, press-events ought not hand-pick the press.
>> Not even close. The press has no "right" to attend an activity sponsored by a corporation.
> Not if it's a wedding or a vacation holiday. But the impending release 
> of big movies are by definition a matter of public interest, and timely 
> reporting on them is the livelihood of a press segment.

The movie industry has no duty to provide reporters a livelihood.