Next <
From: jgrove24 <>
Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id a21mr2920591ioc.27.1510190892798;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:28:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id d7mr164871oti.8.1510190892624; Wed, 08
Nov 2017 17:28:12 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 17:28:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <otsfd6$77k$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=;
References: <otsfd6$77k$>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Disney vs. LA Times
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:28:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 23
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 8:19:21 AM UTC-6, Obveeus wrote:
> To sum it up:
> The Los Angeles Times wrote a story about Anaheim not benefiting from 
> the tax credits given to Disney's Park system.
> Disney has retaliated by denying Los Angeles Times reporters access to 
> advance screenings of Disney films like THOR RAGNAROK.
> In counter-retaliation, the National Society of Film Critics, the Los 
> Angeles Film Critics Association, The New York Film Critics Circle, and 
> the Boston Society of Film Critics have banned all Disney films from 
> their award eligibility.
> The writer of this article claims that banning a Los Angeles film critic 
> from advanced screenings of the film is a violation of the First 
> Amendment.  You'd think that journalists would have at least some 
> understanding of what the First Amendment is about...and as a hint, it 
> isn't about a journalist's 'right' to see movies before the rest of the 
> public can see them.

The SoCal critics are always soft on Hollywood films. I have not seen any star-ratings from LA