From: alvey <alvey@is.invalid>
Subject: Re: Churchill (2017)
Full headers:
From: alvey <alvey@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Churchill (2017)
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 06:13:31 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <>
References: <ouuemj$s34$> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="df2ef2a5a6a96a935fbf37d25383059f";
logging-data="6768"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RXjjlJItsg//lZc5i5y3l"
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 171120-14, 21/11/2017), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BRy0JYiqOMJy7M907vwRUABW1SM=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:28:09 -0700, Neill Massello wrote:

> hector<> wrote:
>> A movie about Winston Churchill in the few days leading up to the D-Day
>> landing at Normandy.  Perhaps unusual to many is that Churchill opposed
>> the operation and wanted something done to divert the Germans at the 
>> same time, or not do the landing at all.  To me the story was ultimately
>> about the effect on Churchill of the Gallipoli landing of 1915 that is
>> the basis of ANZAC Day in Australia, April 25.  History blames him for
>> that tragedy, but he insists in this movie that the fault was with those
>> responsible for carrying it out.  He was haunted for the rest of his 
>> life by it.  This is shown from the beginning of this movie, but the 
>> Gallipoli reference is revealed later in the movie.
>> A historian who writes about truth in movies wrote this screenplay, 
>> Alex von Tunzelmann,
> Churchill was an inspiring orator and a dreadful military strategist.

Indeed. And this is the first time I've ever read that the fat bastard was
"haunted" by the failure of his 'soft underbelly of Europe' folly.