From: hector <>
Subject: Re: Churchill (2017)
Full headers:
From: hector <>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Churchill (2017)
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 23:46:27 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <ov6fvc$e7t$>
References: <ouuemj$s34$>
<> <ov165g$265$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:46:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="0aed3c12a250a61113220fff4bdc869b";
logging-data="14589"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/M0klcWCrSuGIvILTr9inw"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eO6NjF/stGGvzY0tfDY/hS98bSs=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 22/11/2017 5:26 AM, Neill Massello wrote:
> hector<> wrote:
>> Have you seen the movie?
> No. I assume it deals with the story that Churchill kept pushing for a
> continental invasion before the Allied forces were ready for it?

Not at all.  He opposed the D-Day operation because it was a naval 
landing, too much like Gallipoli, Eisenhower, Montgomery wanted it. 
Churchill seems as if his time as relevant to the war effort is passing 
in this story.  He bemoans how Gallipoli was handled in this.  He said 
everyone blamed him but it wasn't just him.
He wanted diversionary actions to make the Germans move their forces 
elsewhere.  He tried to instigate other plans but was overruled behind 
his back.  He was pleased when the weather stopped the invasion.
He says he is still haunted by the Gallipoli disaster.