From: Ed Stasiak <estasiak@att.net>
Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.165.1 with SMTP id k1mr16092239itf.41.1511805883552;
Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:04:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.83.199 with SMTP id i7mr881910oth.3.1511805883433; Mon,
27 Nov 2017 10:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!i6no7600186itb.0!news-out.google.com!193ni4760iti.0!nntp.google.com!193no1192652itr.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:04:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ova1d5$8gq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.192.140.152;
posting-account=Ixrd5gkAAABsU4dRz0UR13K3JpdoZL-Z
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.192.140.152
References: <ova1d5$8gq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <49bcf90d-4834-43d5-a261-15ea8f06607d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
From: Ed Stasiak <estasiak@att.net>
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:04:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3357642195
X-Received-Bytes: 1773
Print Article
Forward Article

> Alan Smithee
>
> More than just a kerfuffle over one superhero movie, the incident raises 
> larger questions about the relationship between reviewers and the 
> public, the editorial objectivity of aggregators and how much studios 
> should be empowered to control the pre-release messaging of their films. 

Not at all, it’s called the 1st Amendment.

The movie studio can simply stop providing preview viewings to critics
if they don’t like what they’re saying.