Next <
From: tsbrueni <>
Subject: Re: Tolerance: Indian politician offers $1.5M for beheading ofBollywood star over Hindu queen, Muslim ruler romance film
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id z6mr1935378iti.36.1511897564599;
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id i7mr5262oth.3.1511897564400; Tue, 28
Nov 2017 11:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:32:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <XnsA83AAE3E229016F089P2473@>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=2602:306:c45f:88c0:0:0:0:3e9;
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:c45f:88c0:0:0:0:3e9
References: <XnsA83AAE3E229016F089P2473@>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Tolerance: Indian politician offers $1.5M for beheading of
Bollywood star over Hindu queen, Muslim ruler romance film
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:32:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2197070793
X-Received-Bytes: 6069
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, November 27, 2017 at 5:07:47 PM UTC-8, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
> hindu-groups.html?intcmp=ob_article_footer_text&intcmp=obnetwork
> A member of India's Hindu nationalist ruling party offered a $1.5 million 
> bounty Sunday for anyone who beheads the lead actress and the director of 
> a yet-to-be released Bollywood film that's sparked controversy for 
> depicting a romance between a Hindu queen and Muslim ruler.
> The film "Padmavati" was set to be in theaters on Dec. 1 and has caused a 
> firestorm over its alleged handling of the relationship.
> Suraj Pal Amu, a Bharatiya Janata Party leader from the northern state of 
> Haryana, offered the bounty against actress Deepika Padukone and filmmaker 
> Sanjay Leela Bhansali.The film's producers postponed the release of the 
> movie the same day.
> Speaking at a public rally, Amu also said the film would not be allowed to 
> be released at all, local media reported.
> The movie "Padmavati" is based on a 16th century Sufi epic poem, 
> "Padmavat," a fictional account of a brave and beautiful Rajput queen who 
> chose to kill herself rather than be captured by the Muslim sultan of 
> Delhi, Allaudin Khilji. Over the centuries, the tale has come to be seen 
> as history, even though there is little historical evidence to support it..
> Padukone plays the role in the film of Padmini, the legendary queen who 
> committed "jauhar," the medieval Rajput practice in which women of royal 
> households walked into funeral fires to embrace death over the dishonor of 
> being taken captive.
> The film has been in trouble since the beginning of the year, with fringe 
> groups in the western state of Rajasthan attacking the film's set, 
> threatening to burn down theaters that show it and even physically 
> attacking Bhansali in January.
> Most of the anger at the film appears to stem from allegations that 
> Bhansali distorted history by filming a romantic dream sequence between 
> the film's main protagonists. Bhansali has denied the allegations.
> Earlier this month, the head of the Rajput Karni Sena in Rajasthan said 
> Padukone should have her nose cut — a symbol of public humiliation — for 
> being part of a film that allegedly insulted the famed queen.
> On Monday, local government officials vowed to take "stringent action" 
> against those threatening Padukone and others involved in the movie, The 
> Indian Express reported.
> India's 1.3 billion-strong democracy is the largest in the world, but 
> despite significant economic progress over the last few decades its 
> politics are held hostage by a complex mix of religion and caste. Books 
> and movies have found themselves at the receiving end of threats of 
> violence and bans because they either offend one religious or caste group, 
> or are deemed offensive to Indian culture in general.
> In the past, India's film censor board rejected the erotic drama "Fifty 
> Shades of Grey," and Hollywood movies that appear on Indian screens are 
> routinely scrubbed of sex scenes. "The Da Vinci Code" was banned in the 
> Indian state of Goa, which has a large Christian population, because 
> religious groups objected.
> On Monday, India's Supreme Court refused to ban the controversial film, 
> saying it is not inclined in the matter and the fate of the film needs to 
> be decided by the country's censor board, India Today reported.
> In its decision, the court said: "The censor board has a role and the 
> Supreme Court cannot assume that role. Why should the court interfere to 
> stop the release of a movie which has not been cleared by the censor 
> board?"
> In 2014, the publishing house Penguin India pulled from shelves and 
> destroyed all copies of American historian Wendy Doniger's "The Hindus: An 
> Alternative History" after protests and a lawsuit from a Hindu right-wing 
> group. The group's main objection was that the book described Hindu 
> mythological texts as fictional.
> India-born writer Salman Rushdie's book "The Satanic Verses" has been 
> banned here since 1998, since many Muslims consider it blasphemous. 
> Rushdie was forced to cancel a 2012 appearance at the Jaipur Literary 
> Festival amid protests and threats by prominent Muslim clerics.

What will Donald J. Trump do about this?