From: moviePig <>
Subject: Re: YOUR NAME (no spoilers)
Full headers:
Subject: Re: YOUR NAME (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <5a216cdd$0$5643$b1db1813$>
From: moviePig <>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:12:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ovrqlg$b5$>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <5a217151$0$10574$b1db1813$>
Organization: Unlimited download news at
X-Trace: DXC=VCjao4MlZW^[[POhj[h0F\L?0kYOcDh@ZUDF9:gAB<fX:OGT9aZlDMU5D\8FcIF?7VOeVCDoJ<H1U_4C62j=]g8]mNEn>a4keGWU6^DRb;TR8P
X-Received-Body-CRC: 888372063
X-Received-Bytes: 3388
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/1/2017 9:57 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> On 12/1/2017 9:53 AM, moviePig wrote:
>> A high-school boy and girl, miles apart, find they've switched bodies. 
>> The hand-drawn fantasy drama YOUR NAME is more than rewarding to look 
>> at, as both the complexity and scope of its story are a year or two 
>> above the adolescent demo typical of anime.  Fans of this stuff may 
>> well be (and apparently are) thrilled.  For me, though, a couple more 
>> years of age-level are needed for an entry in this genre be an 
>> unqualified must-see.  Admittedly, those twain may never meet.  Mostly 
>> recommended.
> What I wrote last month:
> YOUR NAME.:  A 2016 animated feature from Japan.  The story starts off 
> looking like it will follow one of those standard film tropes/themes 
> that we have seen a dozen or more times before.  It does take a bit of a 
> sci-fi (and I use that term loosely) twist and adds some depth as it 
> goes.  The animation here is a bit generic feeling, but it is certainly 
> well done.  The story feels abridged at times, as though they wanted to 
> keep the film under 2 hours and had to cut some transitional bits for 
> time.  Still, this is a good film and certainly worth watching, 
> especially for those looking for family friendly fare.  The IMDB score 
> stands at 8.5 and this film earned over $350million at the box office 
> even though it was limited to only $5million domestically.  I have to 
> attribute the US non-interest as a product of the film choosing not to 
> use a bunch of famous American actors as voice cast.  Well, that and the 
> tiny FUNimation studio backing.

Yeah, I remember reading that now -- might've put me onto the movie.  It 
is interesting to estimate the box-office had they gone with name-voices 
(though I don't know what well-knowns could credibly do high-school). 
Meanwhile, I'm guessing I liked the visuals more than you did, with its 
wonderful little throwaways and minimalisms.  Re 'family fare', I was 
surprised to see such frank boob-groping in a 'PG' (but noted the 
obverse handled so deferentially that I didn't get what was going on).


- - - - - - - -
   YOUR taste at work...