Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:09:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <slrnp24ree.a8f.g.kreme@snow.local>
References: <49cae782-fca4-4e2c-94cd-2c952654a289@googlegroups.com>
<cc803b6c-c18e-478c-b078-8e372579163b@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:09:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cab3ef1563e8d0f27ed666dfb9f586e0";
logging-data="9321"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1svRw9SgcGnM5gnFpjD8d"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Darwin)
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s/WVfL1MDE+ezogLUyU3+mSxPjU=
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Print Article
Forward Article
In message<cc803b6c-c18e-478c-b078-8e372579163b@googlegroups.com> Michael OConnor<mpoconnor7@aol.com> wrote:
> I know the special effects weren't in the same ballpark, but I still
> preferred the 70's TV version of the Incredible Hulk to either of the
> Hulk movies.

that's because the Hulk movies were both bad (differently bad from each
other) and the Hulk series was very good.

The Hulk character in the recent movies has been very good though.

-- 
Some people are like a slinky: Totally useless, but you
can't help but smile when you push them down the stairs