From: Alan Smithee <alms@last.inc>
Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan Smithee <alms@last.inc>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:52:49 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <ovvhsv$sqj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <49cae782-fca4-4e2c-94cd-2c952654a289@googlegroups.com> <ovraau$k4p$2@dont-email.me> <ovstk7$1v6p$1@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnp24r67.a8f.g.kreme@snow.local> <6ccdcbaf-4021-4217-9102-30b9ebebc71c@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hSAAMKC2lQH+hnHJz4lfUA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/02/2017 11:29 AM, Michael OConnor wrote:

>>> If he means DC, not Marvel, then he's right. The JLA movie is their
>>> latest bomb in a string of duds.

>> I don't think anyone can call nearly half a billion dollars a "flop"

> The Wonder Woman movie was the only one that was both a critical and commercial success.

Yep! Everyone and his brother is panning DC's latest offering... and the 
film cost $300 million to make so, "nearly half a billion dollars" isn't 
that much moolah.

I've given up expecting a good "hero movie" from this company. :-(