Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
In article <email@example.com>, hector<firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On 2/12/2017 1:39 AM, Michael OConnor wrote:
> > I know the special effects weren't in the same ballpark, but I still
> > preferred the 70's TV version of the Incredible Hulk to either of the Hulk
> > movies. I think the TV show was able to convey the story of a man on the
> > run with a one of a kind problem, who had a big heart and went out of his
> > way to help people and it always got him in trouble. Another thing I find
> > interesting today that I was too young to realize back then is that it was
> > set against the backdrop of the Carter recession and dealt with a transient
> > man who was constantly trying to find menial work in America and barely
> > getting by and he was working different low-level jobs every week.
> I've come to the realization that movies are actually better if real
> presence of special effects takes precedence over fake cgi ones, I mean
> like having people in suits or something. It's true.
Yeah, a guy in a Hulk suit would make THE AVENGERS so much better. That
wouldn't be ridiculously lame or anything.