From: Ed Stasiak <estasiak@att.net>
Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.189.131 with SMTP id x125mr4894499ite.37.1512277041949;
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:57:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.69.72 with SMTP id p8mr468591oti.4.1512277041862; Sat,
02 Dec 2017 20:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no1828698itb.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni1558itb.0!nntp.google.com!i6no1828694itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 20:57:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <slrnp1r7li.1mdf.g.kreme@jaka.lan>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.192.140.152;
posting-account=Ixrd5gkAAABsU4dRz0UR13K3JpdoZL-Z
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.192.140.152
References: <ova1d5$8gq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <49bcf90d-4834-43d5-a261-15ea8f06607d@googlegroups.com>
<slrnp1r7li.1mdf.g.kreme@jaka.lan>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4e10b631-c022-4212-af7c-32a9c8ff1153@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
From: Ed Stasiak <estasiak@att.net>
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 04:57:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 19
Print Article
Forward Article

> Lewis
> > Ed Stasiak
> >
> > Not at all, it’s called the 1st Amendment. 
>
> No it is not. 

Unless the film critic signed some kinda “approved disclosure” agreement,
they’re free to say whatever they want about the movie or tv show.

> > The movie studio can simply stop providing preview viewings to critics 
> > if they don’t like what they’re saying. 
>
> They can, if they are spectacularly stupid. 

Personally, I find it insulting that film “critics” get an exclusive preview but
that’s the studio’s choice.