Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 05:07:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <slrnp271jp.qub.g.kreme@snow.local>
References: <ova1d5$8gq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<49bcf90d-4834-43d5-a261-15ea8f06607d@googlegroups.com>
<slrnp1r7li.1mdf.g.kreme@jaka.lan>
<4e10b631-c022-4212-af7c-32a9c8ff1153@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 05:07:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1ce0d7e89e71bc7af6e6c6d210697f90";
logging-data="2687"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/DIiRGcnlCqkB2JKdNzwUQ"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Darwin)
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rPKY1o1XGUnvchWMHyGVnZMlmsw=
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Print Article
Forward Article
In message<4e10b631-c022-4212-af7c-32a9c8ff1153@googlegroups.com> Ed Stasiak<estasiak@att.net>
wrote:
>> Lewis
>> > Ed Stasiak
>> >
>> > Not at all, it’s called the 1st Amendment. 
>>
>> No it is not. 

> Unless the film critic signed some kinda “approved disclosure” agreement,
> they’re free to say whatever they want about the movie or tv show.

Either way, has *nothing* to do with the 1st Amendment. 

-- 
I've always had a flair for stage directions.