Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
In message <email@example.com> Alan Smithee<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 11:29 AM, Michael OConnor wrote:
>>>> If he means DC, not Marvel, then he's right. The JLA movie is their
>>>> latest bomb in a string of duds.
>>> I don't think anyone can call nearly half a billion dollars a "flop"
>> The Wonder Woman movie was the only one that was both a critical and commercial success.
> Yep! Everyone and his brother is panning DC's latest offering...
Critics may be, but it has quite decent scores on IMDB from viewers. Also on
Rotten Tomatoes where it has an 81%.
> and the film cost $300 million to make so, "nearly half a billion
> dollars" isn't that much moolah.
> I've given up expecting a good "hero movie" from this company.
I'm assuming you've not seen it.
'There has to be enough light,' he panted, 'to see the darkness.'