Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
On 3/12/2017 11:57 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <email@example.com>, hector<firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> On 2/12/2017 1:39 AM, Michael OConnor wrote:
>>> I know the special effects weren't in the same ballpark, but I still
>>> preferred the 70's TV version of the Incredible Hulk to either of the Hulk
>>> movies. I think the TV show was able to convey the story of a man on the
>>> run with a one of a kind problem, who had a big heart and went out of his
>>> way to help people and it always got him in trouble. Another thing I find
>>> interesting today that I was too young to realize back then is that it was
>>> set against the backdrop of the Carter recession and dealt with a transient
>>> man who was constantly trying to find menial work in America and barely
>>> getting by and he was working different low-level jobs every week.
>> I've come to the realization that movies are actually better if real
>> presence of special effects takes precedence over fake cgi ones, I mean
>> like having people in suits or something. It's true.
> Yeah, a guy in a Hulk suit would make THE AVENGERS so much better. That
> wouldn't be ridiculously lame or anything.
Not adding suits to those movies. Conceiving with more physically real
things I mean.