Next <
Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!kreme.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Critic says TV superhero franchise better than big-screen version
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:55:22 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Miskatonic U
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <slrnp28lla.i8e.g.kreme@jaka.lan>
References: <49cae782-fca4-4e2c-94cd-2c952654a289@googlegroups.com>
<37e08a61-659b-42b4-89ef-9baa7a8c16f3@googlegroups.com>
<p00s6a$ac7$2@dont-email.me> <p00t89$hn7$2@dont-email.me>
<f8is8sF66jsU2@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:55:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: kreme.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1ce0d7e89e71bc7af6e6c6d210697f90";
logging-data="32490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uptymBeinPeYijIJTRB2B"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z
Cancel-Lock: sha1:M8sITyjXhZvl9LHMBLHSGG11nTw=
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Print Article
Forward Article
In message<f8is8sF66jsU2@mid.individual.net> Ted Nolan <tednolan><ted@loft.tnolan.com> wrote:
> In article <p00t89$hn7$2@dont-email.me>, Obveeus<Obveeus@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 12/3/2017 7:54 AM, hector wrote:
>>> On 3/12/2017 1:45 PM, Michael OConnor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've come to the realization that movies are actually better if real
>>>>> presence of special effects takes precedence over fake cgi ones, I mean
>>>>> like having people in suits or something.  It's true.
>>>>
>>>> The only way you could do it with the Hulk, is if you get a massively 
>>>> built guy like Lou Ferrigno and make him up green and stuff, and use 
>>>> CGI to grow him on screen, to make him look about ten feet tall 
>>>> instead of about six feet tall, and distort and enhance his features a 
>>>> little here and there to make him look like the Hulk, and put him 
>>>> amongst the other actors at normal size, and make it look real.  It 
>>>> can be done with special effects, or else they would be doing stuff 
>>>> like that already.
>>>>
>>>> A guy in a Hulk suit looks like a guy in a suit playing Godzilla or 
>>>> King Kong.  Cheesy and phony.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> One major problem with CGI is when they make their animated facsimile 
>>> physically active and the laws of physics aren't quite accurate enough, 
>>> and it looks like a cartoon figure.  Happens a lot with Spiderman.
>>
>>Yes...and WONDER WOMAN turned into a cartoon figure about half way 
>>through her movie, too.
>>
>>As for HULK, I actually think the Lou Ferrigno version worked better in 
>>a lot of ways because he was still real instead of a cartoon character. 
>>That being said, the latest rendition of HULK is a lot better than the 
>>past couple of CGI reboots.

> Surprisingly, the current Thor movie is the best Hulk showcase we've ever had.

Yep.

-- 
By the way, I think you might be the prettiest girl I've ever seen
outside the pages of a really filthy magazine