From: hector <>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
From: hector <>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 00:23:02 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <p03i7u$mn6$>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:23:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="c6f25d34d64be1d6903ac50e4006703b";
logging-data="23270"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/JdZl/GCODy8JfLCHAXKaY"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S+AmS0S8rSg4q63SDafW7q1WJXY=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 4/12/2017 7:09 PM, RichA wrote:
> An $18M tax credit?

The series Aquarius will come across as an accurate documentary compared 
to what Tarantino will fabricate.