Subject: Re: Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire For "Justice League" Review
In message<email@example.com> Ed Stasiak<firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > Ed Stasiak
>> > Unless the film critic signed some kinda “approved disclosure” agreement,
>> > they’re free to say whatever they want about the movie or tv show.
>> Either way, has *nothing* to do with the 1st Amendment.
> “More than just a kerfuffle over one superhero movie, the incident raises
> larger questions about the relationship between reviewers and the public,
> the editorial objectivity of aggregators and how much studios should be
> _empowered to control the pre-release messaging_ of their films.”
> The above implies the studios have some kinda right to control what
> movie critics say about their flicks and that IS a 1st Amendment issue.
No it is not. Not in any imaginable way. Perhaps you should *read* the
It's better to burn out than it is to rust -- Neil Young as quoted be