Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
On Monday, 4 December 2017 23:00:37 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > On Monday, 4 December 2017 07:57:22 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > > > An $18M tax credit?
> > > >
> > > > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> > >
> > > $18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall budget
> > Facetiousness aside, they basically paid for his series. I hope the tax-payers think it's worth
> Facetiousness aside, Tarantino's last film took place primarily in one large room and it cost $44
million to make. PS What series?
Sorry, "movie." California gave away the farm though. Where else was he going to film it but
California? Let Vancouver stand-in for L.A.??