From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantino's latest movie?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.122.81 with SMTP id a78mr11742058itc.4.1512518458794;
Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:00:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.1.175 with SMTP id e44mr893675ote.1.1512518458697; Tue,
05 Dec 2017 16:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!193no2196418itr.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni2296ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no3909499itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:00:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <474d1fe0-7ab6-4a7f-85ca-674f3a22a7d9@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.95.0.172; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.0.172
References: <795c4ee8-3e5c-47fa-a568-82123811d458@googlegroups.com>
<3adcb4bc-5989-4237-ba08-121366cb5531@googlegroups.com> <8bea7b51-e8ca-4bc6-9222-45ddeb1cb18b@googlegroups.com>
<474d1fe0-7ab6-4a7f-85ca-674f3a22a7d9@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d478b42a-f8dc-4c29-bc83-59bd162911b7@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Did California pay for Tarantinos latest movie?
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2213
X-Received-Body-CRC: 599427568
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 4 December 2017 23:00:37 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > On Monday, 4 December 2017 07:57:22 UTC-5, peterjc...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:09:59 AM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> > > > An $18M tax credit?
> > > > 
> > > > http://variety.com/2017/film/news/quentin-tarantino-manson-film-120...
> > > 
> > > $18 million would not even cover the costs for a Tarantino film's catering and Adderall budget
> > 
> > Facetiousness aside, they basically paid for his series.  I hope the tax-payers think it's worth
it.
> 
> Facetiousness aside, Tarantino's last film took place primarily in one large room and it cost $44
million to make. PS What series?

Sorry, "movie."  California gave away the farm though.  Where else was he going to film it but
California?  Let Vancouver stand-in for L.A.??