Next <
From: Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Was Bryan Signer canned as a pre-emptive strike?
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:09:45 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <p0bi38$tci$3@dont-email.me>
References: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:09:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6a94134624109bc7d69ec728b2a22545";
logging-data="30098"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UBfzuGywZhyzxPr6jCm2l"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <7e65f177-1f3f-4357-8b0b-575acb67b658@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fbcyQX8qkoyid/420uZurc7QaLs=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/7/2017 3:19 AM, RichA wrote:
> His sordid reputation hints at it.  The idea that a studio might get rid of him to prevent any
problems with sexual impropriety interfering with their production isn't far-fetched.
> 
> http://www.imdb.com/news/ni61795533/?ref_=nv_nw_tn_1

He was fired for lack of progress / lack of work...final straw.

Sometimes, people have to sacrifice work in order to deal with family 
illness.