From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Will Smith's "Bright" a disaster in the making
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.67.208 with SMTP id s199mr10915497itb.11.1514014080921;
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:28:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.83.199 with SMTP id i7mr735539oth.3.1514014080757; Fri,
22 Dec 2017 23:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no1740922itb.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni5613ita.0!nntp.google.com!g80no1744199itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:28:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p1kik8$id9$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.75.212.51;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.75.212.51
References: <88606c34-b6e5-48a4-a7b6-bfb445b5cf36@googlegroups.com>
<p1i0mc$d5d$1@dont-email.me> <c21ebc11-aa4c-4d43-a79a-a17e40ef7d9e@googlegroups.com>
<p1kik8$id9$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5086ce66-fe4f-4569-80ff-c542ff3b9601@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Will Smiths "Bright" a disaster in the making
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 07:28:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 34
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, 22 December 2017 22:30:17 UTC-5, Obveeus  wrote:
> On 12/22/2017 9:27 PM, RichA wrote:
> > On Thursday, 21 December 2017 23:11:58 UTC-5, Obveeus  wrote:
> >> On 12/21/2017 8:24 PM, RichA wrote:
> >>>
https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=R148WqGxDMSpjwSYt7uICw...
> >>>
> >>> Can't even find it on Rottentomatoes.com which is very interesting.  Paid-off to bury it?
> >>
> >> I'll skip making the obvious joke about why you cannot find BRIGHT.
> >>
> >> https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bright
> > 
> > Not there when I looked.
> 
> Odd since it was there a day before your post when I looked.
> 
> As for the film, it is much better than the rottentomato reviews would 
> have you believe.  Perhaps the film side of the reviewer world is still 
> smarting from the idea that evil Netflix will convince people to watch 
> films in the comfort of their own home instead of the theater?  BRIGHT 
> is not the crime procedural I feared it might be.  It is a bit of 
> sci-fi, but it is just as much alt.history as sci-fi.  Mostly, though, 
> it is a buddy cop flick in the vein of 40 HOURS or BEVERLY HILLS COP.  I 
> know some reviewers don't like the idea of sci-fi having any nudity or 
> swear words, but really there isn't even much of that...and certainly 
> not so much that it should have been a problem for sci-fi viewers. 
> Maybe they were worried about their 8 year old kid's fragile ears and 
> eyes?  Whatever the case, the film is entertaining and manages a bit of 
> funny and a bit of social preaching.  Some of the transitions are a bit 
> rough and the fight sequences are definitely a bit too filled with quick 
> cuts and wire work and such, but the plot is solid enough and does its 
> job creating characters and a world that is interesting and in focus 
> enough to warrant a sequel.

It seems like "Alien Nation" again.