From: Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Will Smith's "Bright" a disaster in the making
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Will Smiths "Bright" a disaster in the making
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 07:57:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <p1ljr8$uek$1@dont-email.me>
References: <88606c34-b6e5-48a4-a7b6-bfb445b5cf36@googlegroups.com>
<p1i0mc$d5d$1@dont-email.me>
<c21ebc11-aa4c-4d43-a79a-a17e40ef7d9e@googlegroups.com>
<p1kik8$id9$1@dont-email.me>
<5086ce66-fe4f-4569-80ff-c542ff3b9601@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:57:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d9cc90a32dd0e41c45e7932c688c7761";
logging-data="31188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184yL+SQP+Hg8SWlTTRoG98"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <5086ce66-fe4f-4569-80ff-c542ff3b9601@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v9lhV2kPRwMolq+MwTrEXrQrVNE=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/23/2017 2:28 AM, RichA wrote:
> On Friday, 22 December 2017 22:30:17 UTC-5, Obveeus  wrote:
>> On 12/22/2017 9:27 PM, RichA wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 21 December 2017 23:11:58 UTC-5, Obveeus  wrote:
>>>> On 12/21/2017 8:24 PM, RichA wrote:
>>>>>
https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=R148WqGxDMSpjwSYt7uICw...
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't even find it on Rottentomatoes.com which is very interesting.  Paid-off to bury it?
>>>>
>>>> I'll skip making the obvious joke about why you cannot find BRIGHT.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bright
>>>
>>> Not there when I looked.
>>
>> Odd since it was there a day before your post when I looked.
>>
>> As for the film, it is much better than the rottentomato reviews would
>> have you believe.  Perhaps the film side of the reviewer world is still
>> smarting from the idea that evil Netflix will convince people to watch
>> films in the comfort of their own home instead of the theater?  BRIGHT
>> is not the crime procedural I feared it might be.  It is a bit of
>> sci-fi, but it is just as much alt.history as sci-fi.  Mostly, though,
>> it is a buddy cop flick in the vein of 40 HOURS or BEVERLY HILLS COP.  I
>> know some reviewers don't like the idea of sci-fi having any nudity or
>> swear words, but really there isn't even much of that...and certainly
>> not so much that it should have been a problem for sci-fi viewers.
>> Maybe they were worried about their 8 year old kid's fragile ears and
>> eyes?  Whatever the case, the film is entertaining and manages a bit of
>> funny and a bit of social preaching.  Some of the transitions are a bit
>> rough and the fight sequences are definitely a bit too filled with quick
>> cuts and wire work and such, but the plot is solid enough and does its
>> job creating characters and a world that is interesting and in focus
>> enough to warrant a sequel.
> 
> It seems like "Alien Nation" again.

It did have some ALIEN NATION feel to it and that was a good thing.  I 
actually would have preferred even more of an ALIEN NATION vibe than it 
had since that was what I was hoping for.

Side note:  At least the reviewers haven't scared people away from the 
film.  IMDB shows that 11,000+ people watched and rated it 
yesterday...and the ratings are all skewed towards the top half of the 
spectrum without looking like a bunch of relatives just chimed in with 
obligatory 10s.