From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Will Smith's "Bright" a disaster in the making
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Will Smiths "Bright" a disaster in the making
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:00:35 -0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <5A429C53.4C61@ix.netcom.com>
References: <88606c34-b6e5-48a4-a7b6-bfb445b5cf36@googlegroups.com>
<p1i0mc$d5d$1@dont-email.me>
<c21ebc11-aa4c-4d43-a79a-a17e40ef7d9e@googlegroups.com>
<p1kik8$id9$1@dont-email.me>
<5086ce66-fe4f-4569-80ff-c542ff3b9601@googlegroups.com> <p1ljr8$uek$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 171226-2, 12/26/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Print Article
Forward Article
Obveeus wrote:
> 
> On 12/23/2017 2:28 AM, RichA wrote:
> > On Friday, 22 December 2017 22:30:17 UTC-5, Obveeus  wrote:
> >> On 12/22/2017 9:27 PM, RichA wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, 21 December 2017 23:11:58 UTC-5, Obveeus  wrote:
> >>>> On 12/21/2017 8:24 PM, RichA wrote:
>      
https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=R148WqGxDMSpjwSYt7uICw...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can't even find it on Rottentomatoes.com which is very interesting.  Paid-off to bury it?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll skip making the obvious joke about why you cannot find BRIGHT.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bright
> >>>
> >>> Not there when I looked.
> >>
> >> Odd since it was there a day before your post when I looked.
> >>
> >> As for the film, it is much better than the rottentomato reviews would
> >> have you believe.  Perhaps the film side of the reviewer world is still
> >> smarting from the idea that evil Netflix will convince people to watch
> >> films in the comfort of their own home instead of the theater?  BRIGHT
> >> is not the crime procedural I feared it might be.  It is a bit of
> >> sci-fi, but it is just as much alt.history as sci-fi.  Mostly, though,
> >> it is a buddy cop flick in the vein of 40 HOURS or BEVERLY HILLS COP.  I
> >> know some reviewers don't like the idea of sci-fi having any nudity or
> >> swear words, but really there isn't even much of that...and certainly
> >> not so much that it should have been a problem for sci-fi viewers.
> >> Maybe they were worried about their 8 year old kid's fragile ears and
> >> eyes?  Whatever the case, the film is entertaining and manages a bit of
> >> funny and a bit of social preaching.  Some of the transitions are a bit
> >> rough and the fight sequences are definitely a bit too filled with quick
> >> cuts and wire work and such, but the plot is solid enough and does its
> >> job creating characters and a world that is interesting and in focus
> >> enough to warrant a sequel.
> >
> > It seems like "Alien Nation" again.
> 
> It did have some ALIEN NATION feel to it and that was a good thing.  I
> actually would have preferred even more of an ALIEN NATION vibe than it
> had since that was what I was hoping for.
> 
> Side note:  At least the reviewers haven't scared people away from the
> film.  IMDB shows that 11,000+ people watched and rated it
> yesterday...and the ratings are all skewed towards the top half of the
> spectrum without looking like a bunch of relatives just chimed in with
> obligatory 10s.

it is a tv show..