From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Subject: Re: Any technical advances in 2017?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hector <bobble@there.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Any technical advances in 2017?
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:17:08 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <p22js4$vt2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <faje58F11puU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:17:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="32cf1f77f545d92ae271b74b73cc0536";
logging-data="32674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19uzyA2BY1bUE4vcl4i3CXc"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.0.1
In-Reply-To: <faje58F11puU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sFP5dvLfxoqMyD6EYvUAPl4p1pA=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 28/12/2017 4:35 PM, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
> Did anything interesting happen with movie-tech in 2017?
> 
> Also, not advances, but
> 
> 	Did we get any HFR in 2017?
> 
> 	How about non-converted 3D


Lap dissolves avoided because they look bad on streaming?