From: trotsky <>
Subject: Re: THE HITMAN'S BODYGUARD (no spoilers)
Full headers:
Subject: Re: THE HITMANS BODYGUARD (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <xRU0C.13474$Qg.8236@fx19.iad> <S951C.140185$iX.55608@fx39.iad>
From: trotsky <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <pY61C.140188$iX.2027@fx39.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 171228-2, 12/28/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <mcc1C.54975$8s5.10843@fx42.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:09:54 UTC
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 14:09:56 -0600
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2134234899
X-Received-Bytes: 1884
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/28/2017 8:11 AM, moviePig wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 7:09 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 12/27/17 4:08 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>> THE HITMAN'S BODYGUARD is a "surefire" serio-comic action-fest 
>>> starring Ryan Reynolds as a bodyguard par excellence assigned to 
>>> protect noted killer Samuel L. Jackson from the even worse despot 
>>> Gary Oldman.  Shades of MIDNIGHT RUN, right? 
>> Midnight Run was hilarious.  This movie doesn't look like it was 
>> intentionally played for laughs.
>   If it weren't, it'd have been cast differently.  But you're right, 
> it's a bit schizo in that regard, to the detriment of both aspects.

Thanks, that's helpful.  I was thinking about seeing it, but something 
about it looked off to me.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.