From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx40.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <O5V0C.97583$gy4.12436@fx35.iad> <oa51C.140186$iX.18942@fx39.iad>
<f_61C.140189$iX.53807@fx39.iad> <Ifc1C.74897$EO4.47558@fx28.iad>
<rpe1C.50053$CG.35552@fx34.iad>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rpe1C.50053$CG.35552@fx34.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <3Oo1C.33516$247.739@fx40.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:29:19 UTC
Organization: http://www.NewsDemon.com
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:29:19 -0600
X-Received-Body-CRC: 973954131
X-Received-Bytes: 2695
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/28/17 4:40 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 3:13 PM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 12/28/2017 8:13 AM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2017 7:09 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/17 4:25 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> A military agent is sent to a remote area of the Afghan desert to 
>>>>> investigate a strange yet ominous report from an old ally.  
>>>>> Directed and co-written by BLAIR WITCH alum Daniel Myrick, THE 
>>>>> OBJECTIVE is a pretty solid, atmospheric little horror thriller.  
>>>>> At 90 minutes it welcomely recalls, and adds to, some of tBWP's 
>>>>> more creative juices. Recommended.
>>>>
>>>> How little is it?
>>>   Like we keep telling you, size doesn't matter...
>>
>> I just don't know what that word is supposed to mean pertaining to 
>> movie.  Actually, I do know: it's a habit in the American vernacular 
>> to throw in wasted words in an effort to sound cogent.  This is both 
>> fascinating and irritating at the same time.
>>
>> https://afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/wasted-words/
> 
> Here, in Google-order, are the five B.P. nominees from 2005:
> 
>     FINding Neverland
>     MILlion Dollar Baby
>     RAY
>     SIDeways
>     THE Aviator
> 
> And here I've ranked them in order of suitability to be called 'little':
> 
> FVQ
> SVA
> ZVY
> ENL
> GUR
> 
> They're in ROT13, "littlest" first.
> 
> You do the ranking, too, before you decode, and we'll see if 'little' 
> actually communicates anything.
> 
> (Anyone can play, and publish the results.)


Interesting, none of the abbreviations you used correspond to the 
abbreviations you assigned on your list.  Has senility finally set in?