Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
On 12/28/17 4:40 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 3:13 PM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 12/28/2017 8:13 AM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2017 7:09 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/17 4:25 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>> A military agent is sent to a remote area of the Afghan desert to
>>>>> investigate a strange yet ominous report from an old ally.
>>>>> Directed and co-written by BLAIR WITCH alum Daniel Myrick, THE
>>>>> OBJECTIVE is a pretty solid, atmospheric little horror thriller.
>>>>> At 90 minutes it welcomely recalls, and adds to, some of tBWP's
>>>>> more creative juices. Recommended.
>>>> How little is it?
>>> Like we keep telling you, size doesn't matter...
>> I just don't know what that word is supposed to mean pertaining to
>> movie. Actually, I do know: it's a habit in the American vernacular
>> to throw in wasted words in an effort to sound cogent. This is both
>> fascinating and irritating at the same time.
> Here, in Google-order, are the five B.P. nominees from 2005:
> FINding Neverland
> MILlion Dollar Baby
> THE Aviator
> And here I've ranked them in order of suitability to be called 'little':
> They're in ROT13, "littlest" first.
> You do the ranking, too, before you decode, and we'll see if 'little'
> actually communicates anything.
> (Anyone can play, and publish the results.)
Interesting, none of the abbreviations you used correspond to the
abbreviations you assigned on your list. Has senility finally set in?