From: trotsky <>
Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id d2mr25611455qtj.51.1514543412674;
Fri, 29 Dec 2017 02:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <O5V0C.97583$gy4.12436@fx35.iad> <oa51C.140186$iX.18942@fx39.iad>
<f_61C.140189$iX.53807@fx39.iad> <Ifc1C.74897$EO4.47558@fx28.iad>
From: trotsky <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <UOo1C.33517$247.11973@fx40.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:30:12 UTC
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:30:11 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1401
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2368453958
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1339
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/28/17 2:46 PM, william ahearn wrote:
> On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 3:13:30 PM UTC-5, Greg Singh wrote:
>> I just don't know what that word is supposed to mean pertaining to
>> movie.  Actually, I do know: it's a habit in the American vernacular to
>> throw in wasted words in an effort to sound cogent.  This is both
>> fascinating and irritating at the same time.

Thanks for re-posting me.  It reminds me of how often people like to 
re-tweet me.