From: moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com>
Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx13.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: THE OBJECTIVE (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <O5V0C.97583$gy4.12436@fx35.iad> <oa51C.140186$iX.18942@fx39.iad>
<f_61C.140189$iX.53807@fx39.iad> <Ifc1C.74897$EO4.47558@fx28.iad>
<rpe1C.50053$CG.35552@fx34.iad> <3Oo1C.33516$247.739@fx40.iad>
From: moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3Oo1C.33516$247.739@fx40.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <g2s1C.18249$yr3.7570@fx13.iad>
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:11:24 UTC
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:11:22 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2278301957
X-Received-Bytes: 2884
Print Article
Forward Article
On 12/29/2017 5:29 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 12/28/17 4:40 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 12/28/2017 3:13 PM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2017 8:13 AM, moviePig wrote:
>>>> On 12/28/2017 7:09 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>> On 12/27/17 4:25 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A military agent is sent to a remote area of the Afghan desert to 
>>>>>> investigate a strange yet ominous report from an old ally. 
>>>>>> Directed and co-written by BLAIR WITCH alum Daniel Myrick, THE 
>>>>>> OBJECTIVE is a pretty solid, atmospheric little horror thriller. 
>>>>>> At 90 minutes it welcomely recalls, and adds to, some of tBWP's 
>>>>>> more creative juices. Recommended.
>>>>>
>>>>> How little is it?
>>>>   Like we keep telling you, size doesn't matter...
>>>
>>> I just don't know what that word is supposed to mean pertaining to 
>>> movie.  Actually, I do know: it's a habit in the American vernacular 
>>> to throw in wasted words in an effort to sound cogent.  This is both 
>>> fascinating and irritating at the same time.
>>>
>>> https://afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/wasted-words/
>>
>> Here, in Google-order, are the five B.P. nominees from 2005:
>>
>>     FINding Neverland
>>     MILlion Dollar Baby
>>     RAY
>>     SIDeways
>>     THE Aviator
>>
>> And here I've ranked them in order of suitability to be called 'little':
>>
>> FVQ
>> SVA
>> ZVY
>> ENL
>> GUR
>>
>> They're in ROT13, "littlest" first.
>>
>> You do the ranking, too, before you decode, and we'll see if 'little' 
>> actually communicates anything.
>>
>> (Anyone can play, and publish the results.)
> 
> 
> Interesting, none of the abbreviations you used correspond to the 
> abbreviations you assigned on your list.  Has senility finally set in?

http://www.rot13.com/

-- 

- - - - - - - -
   YOUR taste at work...
     http://www.moviepig.com