Subject: Re: 12 STRONG: The Left is Upset (Again)
On 1/29/2018 1:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <wVIbC.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> moviePig<email@example.com> wrote:
>> On 1/29/2018 11:56 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <45GbC.1718$Ia3.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>>> moviePig<email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/28/2018 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <pwsbC.537981$iX.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>>>>> moviePig<email@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Though I (fwiw) am neither upset, nor upset if the Left's upset, I'm
>>>>>> curious to know which of this guy's ideas you find particularly absurd.
>>>>> Um... all of them?
>>>> Then let's take two:
>>>> "Instead of movies that objectify women, [I suggest] more films that
>>>> portray sex and sexuality in intelligent ways."
>>>> "[Most war-movies] model a cliched form of masculinity that veers
>>>> from simplistic to monstrous."
>>>> If each of those points is absurd, what's your alternative view?
>>> That they're neither simplistic nor monstrous and Hemsworth's looks are
>>> hardly 'grievous'.
>> So, I infer that you in fact *don't* contest the first quote (about
>> objectifying women).
> No, I'm just bored with that whole nonsense. Men are just as objectified
> in movies.
>> In the second quote, he actually called Hemsworth "grievously
>> *handsome*", which seems entirely analogous to "awfully good-looking" or
>> "terribly attractive". Moreover, in (non-Oscar) combat movies,
>> 'simplistic cliched masculinity' seems a rather common trope.
> Only if you go in with that mindset from the get-go. There was nothing
> simplistic or cliched in AMERICAN SNIPER or ZERO DARK THIRTY, which this
> preening ass lumped in with his whine about 12 STRONG.
>> Point being that, while some of the Left-leaning loons you dig up and
>> post here do occasionally illustrate a degree of entertaining lunacy, my
>> sense is that you didn't bother to actually read this guy...
> I read the entire thing. He's a lunatic who rises and sleeps under the
> blanket of freedom the men and women he loathes provide, then questions
> the manner in which they provide it.
Re whom you think he "loathes":
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...