Subject: Re: How much does Hollywood pay police to conduct fake investigations?
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:06:13 -0800, Ian J. Ball<IJBall@mac.invalid>
> >On 2018-02-01 16:22:31 +0000, Rhino said:
> >> On 2018-02-01 10:34 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>> Just in time for a CBS special airing this weekend about this cold case:
> >>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/02/01/actor-robert-w...
> >>> being-labeled-person-interest-drowning-death-natalie-wood-nearly-four-deca
> >>> des-ag/1085971001/
> >> Uh, Hollywood doesn't pay police *anything*; that's the taxpayers
> >> footing the bill.
> >I hate to say it, but Robert Wagner is a plausible perp. Frankly, it's
> >more believable that they botched the investigation "back in the day"
> >than that they're botching it now.
> At this point they aren't likely to find new evidence and he's being
> the last person to see her alive sounds like what I heard years ago so
> that's not exactly new. Given that the suspicion was that she fell
> overboard (and I think the drug screen showed that she had been
> drinking along with everyone else) it wouldn't be that surprising that
> she could have fallen overboard and no one noticed right away.
> That said, I never heard anyone propose a good reason for why Rober
> Wagner would have killed her. Seems that motive would be a big point
> in trying to move a cold case forward.
He was jelly that she was cheating on him with Walken.
Join your old RAT friends at