From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: How much does Hollywood pay police to conduct fake investigations?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 13:35:30 -0600
Message-ID: <5A760F03.6FD0@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 11:35:31 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: How much does Hollywood pay police to conduct fake investigations?
References: <p4vc28$s28$1@dont-email.me> <p4ves7$irr$1@dont-email.me> <p4vhe6$8hj$1@dont-email.me> <a6o67d92d838bdua2evldm01i0bb569kgs@4ax.com> <5A736E8C.53D4@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180203-0, 02/03/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-bVF68lyXnGCYQbI+tQd43bj1sp4x0vWZ63TqGZIdBjjG9NQHJBRWLfXohtsWBXcYvwv2vQg8KU/kyKI!fxkiK6c9r8oCA1GBQ2boHHHltuaoEQEI7jm6/7F9DJekuRz9ZDGVhV77kUqUlsM1/66Sc2FMpr1F!S5HokO6MU0o=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3038
Print Article
Forward Article
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> shawn wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:06:13 -0800, Ian J. Ball<IJBall@mac.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On 2018-02-01 16:22:31 +0000, Rhino said:
> > >
> > >> On 2018-02-01 10:34 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Just in time for a CBS special airing this weekend about this cold case:
> > >>>
>      
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/02/01/actor-robert-w...
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Uh, Hollywood doesn't pay police *anything*; that's the taxpayers
> > >> footing the bill.
> > >
> > >I hate to say it, but Robert Wagner is a plausible perp. Frankly, it's
> > >more believable that they botched the investigation "back in the day"
> > >than that they're botching it now.
> > >
> > >FWIW...
> >
> > At this point they aren't likely to find new evidence and he's being
> > the last person to see her alive sounds like what I heard years ago so
> > that's not exactly new. Given that the suspicion was that she fell
> > overboard (and I think the drug screen showed that she had been
> > drinking along with everyone else) it wouldn't be that surprising that
> > she could have fallen overboard and no one noticed right away.
> >
> > That said, I never heard anyone propose a good reason for why Rober
> > Wagner would have killed her. Seems that motive would be a big point
> > in trying to move a cold case forward.
> 
> he's innoncent.

it was a boating accident.

you have a few drinks, you fall over..

even if he saw her fall over, he would have to be crazy to try and go
save her...he would die too.

Died trying to save her the headlines would read...