From: Shadow <Sh@dow.br>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6
From: Shadow <Sh@dow.br>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 11:21:43 -0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Shadow
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <p2mg7d5fdn4rr76p92dmhgs2l5idtmaipv@4ax.com>
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p55fa6dba80c8f392c2cefb05d69337128efa322b97b5c58e.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Received-Bytes: 1341
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1611141152
Print Article
Forward Article
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 05:03:50 -0600, trotsky<gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>Doesn't sound too good:
>
>https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/feb/05/the-cloverfield-paradox...

	Cloverfield 2 had the hot Mary Elizabeth Winstead. Not much of
a story, but worth watching, IMHO, if only to see her..

	Cloverfield 3 has a multi-racial cast of ugly people and no
story.....

	Has the movie industry gone to sht since the Trumpet took
office, or is that just a coincidence ?
	The only half-decent film I saw last year was "Wind River".
More for the scenery than actual content.
	[]'s
	
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012