From: Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:40:33 +1300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <p5athv$6q4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad> <HM3eC.21881$d03.5459@fx37.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: AYHRZywo3fidKKpFyMzu/g.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-05 21:12:07 +0000, trotsky said:
> On 2/5/18 1:45 PM, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2018-02-05 11:23:13 +0000, rachel said:
>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 05:03:50 -0600, trotsky wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Doesn't sound too good:
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/feb/05/the-cloverfield-paradox
>>>> review
>>> 
>>> It's being released direct to video rather than in cinemas first. You
>>> expected better?
>> 
>> It's more of JarJar Abrams' incredibly talentless, massively 
>> over-hyped, amazingly incomprehensible drivel ... you expected better??
> 
> Does Star Wars fall in that category too?

Yep, the crappy, lazy-ass reboots he's been making as a so-called 
"Sequel Trilogy" do certainly qualify too. As do his awful, "new 
timeline" Star Trek reboots.

The only thing that talentless hack is "good" at doing is destroying 
franchises and creating incomprehensible messes.   :-(