From: bermuda999 <bermuda999@aol.com>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.120.211 with SMTP id p202mr605546itc.43.1517881737187;
Mon, 05 Feb 2018 17:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.95.135 with SMTP id g7mr32449oti.14.1517881736939; Mon,
05 Feb 2018 17:48:56 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w142no1952334ita.0!news-out.google.com!k194ni7053itb.0!nntp.google.com!o66no698105ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:48:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.103.168.213;
posting-account=_MsbvAkAAAA6N13etSsjeXPJQckxQFUZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.103.168.213
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e0061754-3f9e-4ecc-8272-c3e836b5df02@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
From: bermuda999 <bermuda999@aol.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 01:48:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 21
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 6:03:53 AM UTC-5, Greg Singh wrote:
> Doesn't sound too good:
> 
> https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/feb/05/the-cloverfield-paradox...


As mentioned in your link, it was originally a cheap sci-fi movie called "God Particle" unrelated to
Cloverfield. It was retro-fitted with references to Cloverfield.


The Cloverfield Paradox Lands With a Thud"
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/02/the-clover...

"The Cloverfield Paradox should have been a comedy — and almost is one"
(Netflix’s abrupt release of the third Cloverfield film was apparently meant to beat the bad press)
https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/5/16976184/cloverfield-paradox-revie...