From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.160.195 with SMTP id j186mr1376156qke.54.1517912866038;
Tue, 06 Feb 2018 02:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no1315146qtn.1!news-out.google.com!h12ni206qte.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx06.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.arts.tv
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad> <p59er1$tun$2@news.mixmin.net>
<suXdC.3377$hW2.3334@fx26.iad> <p59q2m$tun$3@news.mixmin.net>
<WL3eC.21880$d03.7886@fx37.iad> <p5bnpj$5g3$1@news.mixmin.net>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <p5bnpj$5g3$1@news.mixmin.net>
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <BqfeC.21603$UK7.1603@fx06.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:27:45 UTC
Organization: http://www.NewsDemon.com
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:27:45 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 2389
X-Received-Body-CRC: 897980826
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2327
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/6/18 2:08 AM, rachel wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:11:17 -0600, trotsky wrote:
> 
>> On 2/5/18 8:35 AM, rachel wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 05:46:32 -0600, trotsky wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/5/18 5:23 AM, rachel wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 05:03:50 -0600, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Doesn't sound too good:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/feb/05/the-cloverfield-paradox
>>>>> review
>>>>>
>>>>> It's being released direct to video rather than in cinemas first. You
>>>>> expected better?
>>>>
>>>> You're confused.  Netflix produces their own movies now, and this is a
>>>> new paradigm in the release channels for movies.  Previously they
>>>> released "Bright" which was both well received and watched by a
>>>> gajillion people.  It's weird how few people seem to have a grasp
>>>> about how the business of movies is conducted.
>>>
>>> Blah, blah, blah ...
>>>
>>> Fact is, I don't recall this Cloverfield Paradox thing getting a wide
>>> theatrical release, or even so much as seeing an ad on TV for it.
>>>
>>> A movie without a theatrical release is direct-to-video, by definition.
>>>
>>> Now please tell me the last time a direct-to-video sequel of *anything*
>>> was anything other than utter crap?
>>
>> Wow, that's quite a pile of shit.  So my little primer on distribution
>> channels of movies went right over your head.
> 
> No, it was irrelevant. 


So are you.  Whose sockpuppet did you say you were?