From: trotsky <>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id m198mr1322445qke.45.1517912902756;
Tue, 06 Feb 2018 02:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad> <p59er1$tun$>
<suXdC.3377$hW2.3334@fx26.iad> <p59q2m$tun$>
From: trotsky <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <arfeC.21604$UK7.17996@fx06.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:28:22 UTC
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:28:22 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1805
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1154198537
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1743
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/5/18 3:39 PM, william ahearn wrote:
> On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 4:11:21 PM UTC-5, Greg Singh wrote:
>> Wow, that's quite a pile of shit.  So my little primer on distribution
>> channels of movies went right over your head.  It's a Netflix movie
>> release through Netflix.  Is Netflix a "video"?  No, it's a streaming
>> video channel.  Is a movie released through a streaming video channel a
>> made for TV movie then?  Not in the conventional sense because they're
>> using production values and budgets deemed for theatrical films.  It's a
>> new paradigm.  If you need help understanding this, just ask.  If you
>> want another exercise in small mindedness there are specific dudes that
>> are best at that.
> trotsky never tires of chasing his tail.

And wee willy ahearn never tires of defecating on topic discussions.