From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.204.203 with SMTP id n72mr981866qkl.30.1517912967315;
Tue, 06 Feb 2018 02:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no1316235qtn.1!news-out.google.com!u51ni335qtk.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx06.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.arts.tv
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad> <HM3eC.21881$d03.5459@fx37.iad>
<p5athv$6q4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <p5athv$6q4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <asfeC.21605$UK7.20579@fx06.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:29:26 UTC
Organization: http://www.NewsDemon.com
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:29:26 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1878
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2937415483
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1816
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/5/18 6:40 PM, Your Name wrote:
> On 2018-02-05 21:12:07 +0000, trotsky said:
>> On 2/5/18 1:45 PM, Your Name wrote:
>>> On 2018-02-05 11:23:13 +0000, rachel said:
>>>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 05:03:50 -0600, trotsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't sound too good:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/feb/05/the-cloverfield-paradox
>>>>> review
>>>>
>>>> It's being released direct to video rather than in cinemas first. You
>>>> expected better?
>>>
>>> It's more of JarJar Abrams' incredibly talentless, massively 
>>> over-hyped, amazingly incomprehensible drivel ... you expected better??
>>
>> Does Star Wars fall in that category too?
> 
> Yep, the crappy, lazy-ass reboots he's been making as a so-called 
> "Sequel Trilogy" do certainly qualify too. As do his awful, "new 
> timeline" Star Trek reboots.
> 
> The only thing that talentless hack is "good" at doing is destroying 
> franchises and creating incomprehensible messes.   :-(


I'm not a fan either, but "Jar Jar Abrams" should be introduced as a new 
character.