From: Obveeus <>
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Full headers:
From: Obveeus <>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:12:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <p5cglr$97f$>
References: <qSWdC.4239$YR7.3667@fx34.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:12:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="436aeaa5e578707ce70e82398aa5d4f1";
logging-data="9455"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19fonuNn+6YTslJqtpSaHBI"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <2gjeC.5841$YR7.3959@fx34.iad>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bERU4Jv2Yb3JMjR+haxMxgUn3HQ=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/6/2018 9:49 AM, moviePig wrote:
> On 2/5/2018 8:48 PM, bermuda999 wrote:
>> On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 6:03:53 AM UTC-5, Greg Singh wrote:
>>> Doesn't sound too good:
>> As mentioned in your link, it was originally a cheap sci-fi movie 
>> called "God Particle" unrelated to Cloverfield. It was retro-fitted 
>> with references to Cloverfield.
>> The Cloverfield Paradox Lands With a Thud"
>> "The Cloverfield Paradox should have been a comedy — and almost is one"
>> (Netflix’s abrupt release of the third Cloverfield film was apparently 
>> meant to beat the bad press)
> This kind of info is what we pay you for.  Many thanks for the two hours 
> I'd never get back...

Given that it has only been out for a day and a half, it isn't doing too 
bad.  Checking IMDB...

THE CLOVERFIELD PARADOX:  6.1rating with 14,391 votes.

as a comparison to theater offerings:

INSIDIOUS THE LAST KEY:  5.8rating with 11,653 votes.
This film has been out for 5 weeks.

SLUMBER:  4.7rating with 1,178 votes.
This film has been out for 8 weeks.

AMITYVILLE THE AWAKENING:  4.9rating with 7,181 votes.
This film has been out for 15 weeks.