Subject: Re: The Cloverfield Paradox
On 2/7/18 7:59 AM, moviePig wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 6:14 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 2/6/18 5:30 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 2/6/2018 6:24 PM, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/18 1:18 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>> tCP now has 6.0 from 15,208. Fwiw, I do think Netflix confers a
>>>>> small pro-bias -- e.g., an anti-establishment sticking it to The Man.
>>>> Anti-establishment? What the fuck are you talking about?
>>> In the movie biz, Netflix is (still) the upstart, the renegade who
>>> delivers what the big studios won't risk. We pull for Netflix.
>> Here is my advice: you shitheads need to start doing the necessary
>> research when talking about any aspect of the business of selling
>> movies, because you look like fucking third graders. Here's an example:
>> Disney Corp., one of the biggest entertainment conglomerates in the
>> history of the universe, has announced its "global streaming plan".
>> Guess what? Netflix is a streaming video channel. Hm, could it be
>> that Disney and others have recognized that streaming video is a new
>> paradigm in the release of its products and are acting accordingly?
>> Guess what else? If Disney is doing it it's just the opposite of
>> "anti establishment". Do you see your error yet?
> The future lies ahead. The present, however, is a concern about whether
> THE CLOVERFIELD PARADOX's hundred minutes will prove rewarding (to me!).
No, we're not talking about your bullshit ways of evaluating a movie
without seeing it, we're talking about your bullshit comment about a
hugely successful company called Netflix is a "renegade" because they
have become successful as an alternate distribution channel for movies.
If this shit is over your head you should probably just avoid the subject.