Next <
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Subject: Re: NOCTURNE (no spoilers)
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.45.22 with SMTP id n22mr255900qta.11.1518088590215;
Thu, 08 Feb 2018 03:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21-v6no628170qtn.1!news-out.google.com!u51ni384qtk.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx37.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: NOCTURNE (no spoilers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <O2qeC.3837$5D1.933@fx01.iad> <p5dbah$uun$1@dont-email.me>
<RPqeC.15423$KA7.10675@fx05.iad> <p5dti5$nmh$1@news.albasani.net>
<HUDeC.3069$eZ5.1720@fx19.iad>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <HUDeC.3069$eZ5.1720@fx19.iad>
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <hkWeC.23767$d03.14944@fx37.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 11:16:29 UTC
Organization: http://www.NewsDemon.com
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 05:16:29 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 2198
X-Received-Body-CRC: 161722086
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2136
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/7/18 8:18 AM, moviePig wrote:
> On 2/6/2018 10:59 PM, Obveeus wrote:
>> On 2/6/2018 6:25 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 2/6/2018 5:47 PM, Obveeus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/6/2018 5:33 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Six high-school seniors gather for an evening of partying and 
>>>>> spooky soul-searching.  For the first half of its 90 minutes, 
>>>>> NOCTURNE promises a somewhat stylish and above-average 
>>>>> horror-flick.  Then the second-half goes off the rails like a bent 
>>>>> bicycle.  Minimally recommended.
>>>>
>>>> NOCTURNE a film that really does look like a direct to DVD offering 
>>>> with a 4.7 IMDB score and yet you watched this while forgoing the 
>>>> 6.0 THE CLOVERFIELD PARADOX?
>>>
>>> I go into each movie pursuing a glimmer of hope.  But a movie being 
>>> blatantly painted over to ride another's coattails snuffs that out.
>>
>> By 'painted over', I guess you me rewrite draft of a script?
>>
>> Side note:  the last CLOVERFIELD film (10 CLOVERFIELD LANE) was also a 
>> rewrite of a different spec film script (THE CELLAR).
> 
> If tCP was merely a rewrite, i.e., was "Cloverfield"ed before the 
> cameras ever rolled, that'd make a difference to me.  But I thought it 
> was filmed, shelved, and then re-titled with extreme prejudice.
> 


That's also incorrect.