From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Subject: Re: "The Big Sick"
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.164.149 with SMTP id n143mr9894819qke.19.1519728433779;
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 02:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!t24no213615qtn.0!news-out.google.com!m4ni15qte.0!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx36.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: "The Big Sick"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <8xwkC.122770$UK7.49436@fx06.iad>
<gbtqjzapsemv.vo0q2j4lmscg.dlg@40tude.net> <2bFkC.184761$qv.85170@fx33.iad>
<ojhefcj51w9u$.znkw8j59pjta.dlg@40tude.net> <lAQkC.75352$YR7.60860@fx34.iad>
<fhe2uqvn17cs.1du375uv6whkz$.dlg@40tude.net> <Y4%kC.7040$VM2.887@fx01.iad>
<1hfynooewijen.n1e92osohgqw.dlg@40tude.net> <7Q0lC.76831$kZ2.22796@fx41.iad>
<ax4qj11s8kta.2kcghblt1rzj.dlg@40tude.net>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ax4qj11s8kta.2kcghblt1rzj.dlg@40tude.net>
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <RGalC.117662$9%2.52359@fx36.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:47:13 UTC
Organization: http://www.NewsDemon.com
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 04:47:13 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 2852
X-Received-Body-CRC: 987630109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2790
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/26/18 6:54 PM, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:34:28 -0600, trotsky wrote:
> 
>> On 2/26/2018 5:09 PM, alvey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:35:53 -0600, trotsky wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>>>> Interesting.  You lack a point of reference, though, any fucking moron
>>>>>> with a keyboard and an ISP can say everything is shit, but for some
>>>>>> reason they all lack the brains and the balls to tell us what's good.
>>>>>> So far, as near as I can tell, you have no sense of humor whatsoever and
>>>>>> wouldn't know a comedy if it smacked you in your brain dead cranium.
>>>>>> Your mileage may vary though.  Now let's see if you can grow a spine and
>>>>>> give us a list of the comedies you think are "funny".
>>>>>
>>>>> No worries!
>>>>>
>>>>> You.
>>>>
>>>> Brains and balls, tough to come by these days.
>>>
>>> Swings and roundabouts. There's an over-supply of keyboard hard men.
>>
>> Is that supposed to be humor, alvey?
> 
> Me? Humour? Neverrrr. I gave that up when America ceased to be a respected
> country.
> 
>> It would explain why you didn't like the movie?
> 
> Being pedantic, I never said that I "didn't like the movie". My opinion was
> that it's over-rated because of the scarcity of its genre and the
> relentless barrage of violent crap. And Judd Apatow.
> 
> This is what's known as A Difference of Opinion.
> You need to learn to live with it.


Yes but "Judd Apatow sucks" isn't a well informed or well stated 
opinion.  It makes you look stupid.  Also, saying something "isn't 
funny" without have the brains or balls to establish a point of 
reference for what you find funny also makes you look stupid as well as 
making you look like you're missing genitalia.  Any questions?