From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Watching, or not watching, the Oscars
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.36.127.135 with SMTP id r129mr5353757itc.48.1520130200584;
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 18:23:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.11.165 with SMTP id 34mr528693oth.7.1520130200423; Sat,
03 Mar 2018 18:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!e10no901643itf.0!news-out.google.com!a25ni2289itj.0!nntp.google.com!e10no901639itf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:23:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7f48dacd-1261-482e-b32c-a6116e186cd2@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.217.69.148;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.217.69.148
References: <7f48dacd-1261-482e-b32c-a6116e186cd2@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5684a85f-b350-467c-a453-fa39c82a4e9d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Watching, or not watching, the Oscars
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 02:23:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 7
Print Article
Forward Article
Aside from the left-wingism of the Oscars, this year was dog's breakfast for movies on the whole.  I
remember one other year where it was lousy too, sometime in he 90's.  It would show a great deal of
integrity to simply say, "sorry, but no movie this year merited a best picture nomination so we
aren't granting an award." Plus, we ALL know that smaller movies which play only in restricted
markets rarely get nominated despite the fact some may be considerably better than the mainstream
offerings.