From: trotsky <>
Subject: Re: Watching, or not watching, the Oscars
Full headers:
Subject: Re: Watching, or not watching, the Oscars
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
References: <>
From: trotsky <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180304-0, 03/04/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <3rZmC.28047$303.10057@fx24.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 21:21:03 UTC
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 15:21:04 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1604
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1063690728
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/3/2018 8:23 PM, RichA wrote:
> Aside from the left-wingism of the Oscars, this year was dog's breakfast for movies on the whole. 
I remember one other year where it was lousy too, sometime in he 90's.  It would show a great deal
of integrity to simply say, "sorry, but no movie this year merited a best picture nomination so we
aren't granting an award." Plus, we ALL know that smaller movies which play only in restricted
markets rarely get nominated despite the fact some may be considerably better than the mainstream

Such as?

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.