From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
Subject: Re: Oscar ratings crash - maybe the lowest of all time
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.current-films
Subject: Re: Oscar ratings crash - maybe the lowest of all time
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:19:58 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <super70s-FE0E57.12195706032018@reader02.eternal-september.org>
References: <0494d643-d4d1-417a-a198-846bf23d89bc@googlegroups.com> <super70s-40AFE2.08415606032018@reader02.eternal-september.org> <p7mg2n$kdp$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="74623860d28c81378f4aee0d698995dc";
logging-data="17275"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+i8H192l3RYBNH6jIw2pfdY9dxV1kxChM="
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (PPC Mac OS X)
X-No-Archive: yes
Cancel-Lock: sha1:35wOATrPDrmbehtla/rbFVkMBdg=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <p7mg2n$kdp$1@dont-email.me>, Obveeus<Obveeus@aol.com> 
wrote:

> WONDER WOMAN didn't get nominated to pull in the popular film crowd.  
> I know my desire to even watch went from low to zero when THE BIG SICK 
> didn't get nominated for Best Picture.

The way they've expanded the nominees list in recent years you'd think 
they would have gone "what the hell let's add them too," WW particularly 
for the women's cause de jour.

If they thought WW was too pedestrian what about the big fuss over LOTR 
a few years back.