From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:42:23 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <231020171242239586%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <5j2suctcn6mfirfs403pekdhlh584vc90o@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="396b8b33f5ba08f88289454dde684000";
logging-data="25311"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197eYxduG62sDZe5gibYsQh"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:veAQHl0/JDmH1hpvXXk0uvmQNQY=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<5j2suctcn6mfirfs403pekdhlh584vc90o@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper<tonycooper214@gmail.com> wrote:

> LR CC removes certain settings from the Basic panel and puts them in a
> different panel.  Clarity is in Effects, for example.  No problem
> really, but the person who using LR CC has to figure where things are
> now and adjust.  There doesn't seem to be a good reason for that type
> of change.  
> 
> If the function is there in both versions, then it would seem sensible
> to have the interface as close as possible to the same on both rather
> than make the users figure out where what is.

the latest lightroom cc is a new app with different design goals, which
means there *will* be differences from classic.

classic is actually the update to lightroom 6 and previous cc, not the
latest cc. 

it's very unlikely that someone would be using both apps.