From: newshound <>
Subject: Re: Scanning 35mm negs and slides
Full headers:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 05:34:38 -0500
Subject: Re: Scanning 35mm negs and slides
References: <>
From: newshound <>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:34:39 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <>
Lines: 25
X-Trace: sv3-A1Im3V0cI/tgO7yl/IypOEU44wIC4vMGNTHWmVnibhJiABH4kXwARbzEIlbW/bNJ8rY3RmWgbuhqMr5!zxxJsHn/7egiKNle9nMzlVKV08JSLZxWX2ZZJDqwPtxmwu4mQYyXrXdV14+cWUbqGhRHyS7q/Nja!FRhgVxSy2Qd9yQNr8ebqbRMgfCg=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2479
Print Article
Forward Article
On 24/10/2017 20:33, Alan Browne wrote:
> On 2017-10-24 09:26, newshound wrote:
>> I have an ancient (and almost unused) Dimage Scan Dual IV which I 
>> believe was well rated in its day. Is it still worth taking the 
>> trouble to try to get it working on Win 10 (I also have a Macbook Pro 
>> and a Unix box)? No current drivers from Minolta/Konica I understand, 
>> should I invest in VueScan, or something else?
>> Or would it be easier just to buy something more recent? Not looking 
>> to spend "professional" money, but not bargain basement either.
> I'd get it up and running, but I'm funny that way.  That scanner was a 
> late model, the last from Minolta being the 5400 (and 5400 II).  I had 
> the 5400 and it was excellent.  (Sold it and bought a Nikon 9000ED).
> Is VueScan worth it?  Sure.  Currently it's about US$90.  Question is: 
> can you get equivalent (or better) scans of the photos of interest for 
> less cost (and hassle).

Thanks both for the advice on VueScan. I've been burned before with 
trialware that has great reviews on-line, takes an age to get setup and 
working, turns out to have the feature I wanted to test crippled, and 
only then declares its true cost.

I'll give it a try.